Week 9 – The medium is the massage by Michael McLuhan
MESSAGE!
MESSAGE NOT MASSAGE! MESSAGE!
Massage: the typo in the title retained by McLuhan
as if to prove the point entirely. That point being, of course, that medium in
which the message is delivered is more important than the message itself.
Immediately alarm bells ring. The content is unimportant? Should be
disregarded?
A moment of further analysis will realise that
the message McLuhan is conveying cannot be that easily trivialised into the
sound bite newspeak. If one were to attempt to compress McLuhan’s actual
message, you may end up concluding with something more akin to: The method of
communication has more of an effect on history than one particular message. Not
as catchy however much easier to relate too and understand.
The main example used to explain McLuhan’s
thought process is the invention of the printing press in the 15th
Century. Suddenly information could be ‘mass’ produced. No longer was the
written word only the reserve of the aristocracy and clergy. It is widely
regarded that the printing press was the medium of the reformation throughout
16th Century Europe, a defining moment of the evolution of western
culture. And yet many of us could not recall any of the messages or arguments
which informed it.
McLuhan goes on to discuss the difference
between what he calls ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ mediums. Media such as letters or spoken
word were classed as ‘hot’ because they require an amount of engagement and
interaction from the receiving party. Whereas television would be classed in
the McLuhan rolodex as ‘cold’ as it can be consumed completely passively.
Architecturally a similar distinction could be made between a hand drawn set of
plans, where every single mark has had to be fully considered before being
committed to paper, and an easily editable CAD drawing. Or possibly how a more
abstract perspective can actually say more than a VRay photorealistic render.
McLuhan didn’t live to see the manifestation of
the ‘Global Village’ he hypothesised.
Known to you and I as the internet, or more accurately the world wide web. Just
as in the 15&16th centuries the printing press transformed the
way information was distributed, the internet or specifically social media has
transformed the world. Whether to help fuel the Arab Spring in 2010/11 or to
use targeted propaganda to install a pantomime villain as the ‘leader of the
free world’ (the phrase American Presidents use as tobacco at moments their
arse doesn’t contain the adequate amount of smoke). But where does social media
fit into McLuhan’s system? Advertising and video are very obviously cold
mediums yet one can interact with them through the comments which accompany any
post. The more the social aspects of social media are used the further the
temperature rises. And whilst I find the concept of describing a medium as
luke-warm amusing social media seems to be the power culmination of the McLuhan
world.
To draw to a close the discussion there is very
large hole in the McLuhan theory, without the message there is no media. At the
end of the day the medium is only ever a distribution network, and as with all
modern distribution networks, it is becoming infinitely more complex and is
able to allow ideas to reach many more people. So in an attempt to close in a
statement akin to McLuhan’s: The medium is the macro, message the micro.
Comments
Post a Comment